Incomplete Geometry

In the process of investigating the genome piece there was a podcast of it which included a prior segment.

[Very Rough Thinking In Progress]

In a bit of preemptive* positing, I note the potential significance of 8 and 24 dimension.

Could it be that it is related to the fact that 2 cubed is eight and 8x3 is 24. 

I say that without quibbling** over the definition of dimensions, but to say they are using it too purely mathematical. 

But now that I have spelled it out, might it represent 3 dimensions in each of the 8 quadrants of standard x-y-z grid.  Or am I just putting into words what it actually means in their math?

* having listened to the podcast but not done the math
** @ t we already have a different definition or do we?  (x,y,z, & t)
then there are the dimentions[!] of Arthur Young, and by golly was that 8 or v/7?***
[!]= irony or (sic) that I found him with that spelling

Filing purposes:
Or round file of clean desktop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leech_lattice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion


https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160421-the-evolutionary-argument-against-reality/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflation-triangles/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160330-sphere-packing-solved-in-higher-dimensions/


*** I was not aware of Young when I developed my own tetrahedron
(I credit a parsing of Einstein and a recreation of The Republic for my structure.)

BTW:
What is living?

5-4-16 
May the Fourth be with you!
Quantum Bookmarks:  3:40, 5:16, 5:4, 6:50, ...

5-5-16  OW / VP  (need more labels)

The Square Root of

[" i. "]

This ... is not being facetious or Freudian.  But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*




BTW:  NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive








Co-wink Key-dink ?  D'oh!




(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)

1.  the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2.  Chesterton on importance of fables
3.  ditto
4.  semantic (bs)/bs
5.  Mobius
Notational  Segway [!] *



*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you

Intelligence is a three-way street?

Such is the right ?

(under construction began 5-19-15)

In the mean time?

There are rights, there is the right and there is right. 
The Right to Rise is the inspiration or project for the new American Millenium.*

* Hoyle? A. Bin(un)Jun'Go , B. "Timing is everything.", C. Tidal Report, D. There was the 3 AM call... , E. We R all Right? , F., G., H., I., J?.  

Ironic or Penta Cost All

replies? 

Not to offend sectarians or teflon precedents...
But it is about the potential 5th column for prospects and actions*.
There are three branches of government with the press of the people.
There will be four reactions to Obama Nation [!]

Cathy McMorris-Rogers for GOP
Tea Party
Libertarian
and His panic? 

*Asimov/Rand Vortex ?

Die Mentionalism

NO not that[!]  THIS


under this:

FOX whole
Journalism
and Fracking [!] 

Heuristic Concurrence and

Hermeneutics *or

plane fecundity.

* knot (5th D)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/concurrence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics

Math is next to Godliness, geometry agnostic** to physics.[!]


** [!] i.e. to sort or transcend later
From the principles or tri angle(tan gent)lations or field works. The 4thD = a. Time b. Perpendicular c. E=mcHammer***  d. Tangent to eachGe. (4 mu lations)

*** two inserts 9-24 (@ later & Hammer) also Re: * Knot to go on, but more on 4 mu lations/=/"action of bringing or proposing"

Them and Us[!]

Is there? **
Who dat ? *

*not to pun(k)***
** pre-M-bed
[original in-tent ?]
***[tuation]


7-10-13 need to review Footnote Pages  [ ***(FP4)] *

(7-10-13) Two Points [!]   (reformatted)

Physiks? (FP1)  i.e. If businesses are persons, we need equal representation and taxation under the law.  That might imply that a flat tax(or flatter tax) might work if there were basic tax exemptions applied equally and without targeting.  (potential FP to sort)(FP2) The catch is the will of the reformers. (Or avoiding the Tax Reform Trap.) (There may also be a democracy trap [!])

*Re: Cycle asterisks (FP!)

Knot Even

A Case !*

I seemed to have been blogging in my sleep again.  In fact, I felt like I was even extending some unconscious blog or other draft work. Now, it was not my intent that 4 words(forwards?) be the case, but there was something about the self-reference("this sentence is false") being a bit ungrammatical.  I could just be me, but it is about self-reference, and dreams can undo that. OW, that was a role. But back from my Tan gent or Go sine.** (it seams) In order to be true or false would it not need another reference*** to be true or false? That is my case, and I will 4go any pun on M-beds in bed or post you lates or quad.

*search (six of one)
**(a bit anacronistic) at this point I note that "this sentence is" are actually 3 self references.
*** see 4D 'n perspective other ? ?

Nail Meet F--C---[!]

Fulcrum meet Hammer!

WTF?
OW/WTO?
Pro-Ce$$[!]
@'AX?
Seal?{C-L}
Process President: bit of ObTu$ity!
CommUni K-shuns?
6 S I G M A (b.s.) CtrlF[@'h]
Conn $ent Ration: BTL

11-22-12 [C-VC]

Try Angle

Here are a few pieces that intersect.
Re-Rights,
Checks,
And Balances. [^^^]

How? Well, we have the Judiary, Congress, and the Executive perspectives.
The bottom line is account ability. Yes, that is two words under three branches.
We have the accounting of Bush v. Gore, trickle down, and the slippery slope. Juctices can't count, economics does, and they all matter. I will try not fall into the trap of the previous post with technical difficulties arising from the burden of
tangents and links, or whatever the problem*** is, but it is a matter of looking back** at where we were and how we got there, with Bush the Decider, the current economic climate of understanding Trickle-Down and Slippery-Slopes, and the Executive we are lucky to have in the face of mythical* obstructionism and obfuscation. In fact, again I have only read the first and glanced a bit at the others but they are almost a protractor or other instrument of our graphic nature and the geometry of purpose that some have. i.e. It was not my original intent but maybe there is some intelligent design, in that it is about Re-Writing our social architecture. Re-writing checks and balances, economics is the bottomline and whether there is Bane or Change, and I don't mean Bain or Boehner.

* mythical: as in monstrously huge if not fantastical.
** well they did arise so there! I mean here:
and see Lord of markets,
and values politics. Economics is not without politics and values.***

*** "convenient" link see placement(^) of asterisk "the problem" re: positive/normative "dispute" or die-manics of dynamics.

(^) (more ttdl: footnote search own comment(^^) re: economics being engineering. ...?)

(^^) [3-13-12 update: my ttdl(temp tech difficulty linking) is now corrected, also found my comments on economics being a field of social engineering. Featured caricature? Herbert Spencer. ALSO RE : Politics ]

[ Unrelated: if war were not related to economics.(NFRY) Also too bad.]

[^^^ Tag tomorrow : From the original Try Angle we have the 3 branches as we navigate the world of economics and power relations.]

Flow of Conscience

Not Exactly Either,
nor Out of the Box.
Speaking of Supply and Demand
or trickle down and bubble up.
No Dead C Scroll over, nor out.

Just a hint that things are not black and white,
nor up without down, let alone level or limited.
The original trigger was a conversation at a holiday party,
which I wished to amend here,
while John Dean and William James[***] were part of the head water or ledership.

[Speaking of flow, and roots or branches.]

[See Three Comments]
[Seg Way: E pit o'me[!]
/ I will now slightly edit a bit of above,
without adding any links as after thoughts unless noted.(see italics)]

[For the scroll-over challenged*, I will list the links in order...
(under construction I through XIX)
I Sciousness, wiki.
II Pandora, wiki.
III Theodicy, wiki.
IV Supply, blog search
V Demand, ibid.
VI slippery slope, ibid.
VII Power Broker, ibid.
VIII scroll, ibid.
IX ibid.,ibid[?]
X "Conservatives without Conscience"
XI "The Liberal Conscience"
XII Try-Unism
XIII google find "liberal conscience Dean"/Howard
XIV ibid. /Baker
XV "X & Y Chromo Somes", my blog
XVI "Image of Original In Tent", ibid.
XVII December 2011 archives, ibid.
XVIII "A PEAS Meant", ibid.
XIX "Post Script", ibid.
SEGUE:
Seg Elizabeth Warren replies to Karl Rove
Way Her way (video).
Epitome
[!] Sat Ire
A bit frayed at the edges.

*or to save you a trip

[See Comments up to the sixth, then I was Roving my web pages and found this. Speaking of Prophetic Tributes. Innocence bUy...to the good fight.]
[Speaking of frayed.**]

** see Seg Way source LA Times.
[***] 12-13-11 Correction to James(not Blake)

HiAteUs?

There seems to be no more than 4 dimensions.
3D+T or Delta.
Physics, Economics and Theology, in time.
2cubed=8 Δ
[7-6-11 puiblished from draft...NOT]
[7-8-11 link added]

Tip of the IceBurg

Not exactly a pyramid scheme...that takes the village.
Speaking of Bills or Tips.